House Committee on Education (02/09/2015)

Final
STAFF SUMMARY OF MEETING

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION

Date:	02/09/2015	ATTENDANCE

Time:	01:38 PM to	Everett	X
		Fields	X
Place:	HCR 0107	Garnett	X
		Lee	X
This Meeting was called to order by		Lundeen	X
	Representative Buckner	Moreno	X
		Priola	X
This Report was prepared by		Wilson	X
	Lisa Gezelter	Windholz	X
		Pettersen	X
		Buckner	X
		X = Present, E = Excused, A = Absent, * = Present after roll call

Bills Addressed:		Action Taken:
HB15-1037 HB15-1108 HB15-1199		Postponed Indefinitely Postponed Indefinitely Postponed Indefinitely

01:39 PM -- HB15-1037

Representative Buckner, Chair, welcomed the committee and audience members. He discussed the large number of witnesses signed up and the need for timing witness testimony and for legislators to keep their questions brief.

Representative Priola, sponsor, presented House Bill 15-1037, which guarantees the right of religious groups on public college or university campuses to set requirements for their leadership without having to abide by university non-discrimination policies. Representative Priola responded to questions from the committee. He discussed the packet he handed out (Attachment A). Representative Priola continued to respond to questions from the committee. The sponsor and committee discussed the term "standards of conduct" as used in the bill. They discussed university non-discrimination policies and how those may or may not be compatible with the bill.

15HouseEd0209AttachA.pdf

01:57 PM

Representative Priola continued to respond to questions from the committee. They discussed the standards of conduct requirements for non-religious university groups and whether practitioners of different religions can lead a religious group on campus.

02:02 PM

The following people testified on the bill:

02:02 PM -- Theresa Sidebotham, representing the Christian Legal Society, testified in support of the bill. She distributed a packet of information (Attachment B). She discussed the needs of religious student groups and the challenge these groups face based on university policies and state law. She discussed diversity on campus and said complete non-discrimination is not necessary to maintain diversity on campus. She discussed religious freedom and the first amendment, and how religious groups are free to practice their own religion. She said that national religions can discriminate based on behavior, so campus groups should be able to as well. She discussed relevant court cases. Ms. Sidebotham responded to questions from the committee. They discussed the needs of religious groups.

15HouseEd0209AttachB.pdf

02:22 PM -- Barry Arrington, representing the Colorado Bar Association Civil Rights Committee, testified in support of the bill. He discussed freedom of religion and freedom of association. He discussed the Supreme Court case Christian Legal Society (CLS) vs. Martinezand said the decision gives universities the power to maintain and enforce all-comers policies. He stated that even though universities can have all-comer policies, they should not enforce these policies. Mr. Arrington responded to questions from the committee.

02:36 PM -- Yvonne Williams, representing Care Net Pregnancy Support Centers and Malorie Osteen, representing Real Choices at the University of Colorado (CU), testified in support of the bill. Ms. Williams discussed her experiences with her group on the CU Campus. She explained that pregnancy support centers are religious groups with a Christian statement of faith that provide support to women to continue both their pregnancies and their education. She told the story of a student who wanted to lead the group but did not agree with the group's statement of faith and principle and how that student filed a complaint with the university. She explained that the group was asked to leave the campus. She discussed letters from the affiliated group on the University of Colorado - Auraria campus to the committee (Attachment C). Ms. Osteen discussed her experiences. The witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

15HouseEd0209AttachC.pdf

02:50 PM

The committee discussed the provisions of the bill.

02:52 PM -- The preceding two witnesses continued to respond to questions from the committee.

02:56 PM -- Michelle Ehgotz, representing Campus Crusade for Christ (CRU) at the University of Northern Colorado (UNC) testified in support of the bill. She discussed the importance of religious groups on campus and how they help students. She discussed the difficulty of her transition to life at UNC. She discussed the need to maintain diversity on campus and the benefits of different religious groups. She told the committee that leaders of religious groups should adhere to statements of faith or principle so the group and its purpose remain pure.

03:00 PM -- Emily Wagner, representing Campus Crusade for Christ (CRU) at the University of Colorado - Boulder, testified in support of the bill. She discussed the activities of the organization and the purpose of the leadership team. She discussed the presence of religious groups on campus and how these groups serve students. She told the committee that leaders need to be aligned with the values of the group so the group's purpose is not lost.

03:02 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

03:15 PM -- Natalie Decker, representing the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), spoke in support of the bill. She discussed the ADF and its activities to support religious groups on campuses in Colorado. She discussed the provisions of the bill, universities' role as the marketplace of ideas, and religious groups place within that role. She told the committee the bill does not allow discrimination against participants, but allows religious groups to select their own leaders based on their own beliefs. Ms. Decker distributed two handouts (Attachment D) and responded to questions from the committee.

15HouseEd0209AttachD.pdf

03:31 PM -- Roderick Harger, representing St. Joseph Campus Ministry, spoke in support of the bill. He discussed his organization, its process for selecting leaders, and the importance to his organization of having Roman Catholic leaders.

03:34 PM -- Joseph Paskovich, representing St. Joseph Campus Ministry, spoke in support of the bill. He discussed the requirement for a religious group's leaders to adhere to the faith. He provided an example of his group being discriminated against when the Colorado School of Mines threatened to deny the group meeting space.

03:36 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

03:49 PM -- Joe Cohn, representing the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), testified in support of the bill. He discussed the nonpartisan nature of his group and the reasons for his organization's support for the bill. He discussed pluralism and its importance. He told the committee that groups should be able to choose not only their own leaders' criteria, but criteria for membership as well. He discussed CLS vs. Martinez. He discussed his experience at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) before working at FIRE. He told the committee he would support an amendment extending the protections in the bill to all student organizations, not just religious groups. Mr. Cohn responded to questions from the committee.

04:01 PM -- Phillip Bell, State Legislative Director of First Amendment Partnership, testified in support of the bill. He said that groups should be able to elect student leaders who share their beliefs and that groups should be able to have criteria that one has to meet in order to be a part of the leadership. Mr. Bell distributed his testimony (Attachment E) and answered questions from the committee about whether the bill promotes discrimination.

15HouseEd0209AttachE.pdf

04:07 PM -- Ken Summers, representing Chi Alpha Campus Ministries, testified in support of the bill. He stated that a group leader's conduct is what the bill addresses and asserted that everyone should be able to participate in group activities, but not everyone who participates is going to be qualified to lead the group or organization. He argued that each group should be allowed to develop its own bylaws and rules and the government or campus authorities should not be able to demand that the bylaws be written in a prescribed manner.

04:11 PM -- Nathaniel Banke, representing Chi Alpha Campus Ministries, spoke in support of the bill. He told the committee that Christian groups should be allowed to be Christian. He talked about his personal experiences with Christian student groups and stated that he does not know of any student organizations that want to discriminate.

04:15 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

04:26 PM -- Aaron Robertson, representing the Patriot League, spoke in support of the bill. He discussed the Pillar Project and the rest of his organization's activities. He discussed the First Amendment.

04:29 PM -- Donna Jack, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill.

04:33 PM -- Corporal Andrew England, representing himself, spoke in opposition to the bill. He discussed his experiences as a student and his fears that the bill will sanction discrimination by student groups. Corporal England responded to questions from the committee.

04:39 PM -- Nathan Woodliff Stanley, representing the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Colorado, spoke in opposition to the bill. He discussed his view that the bill is not about First Amendment free speech rights. He said student groups do not have the right to be funded to operate in a discriminatory manner. Mr. Stanley responded to questions from the committee.

04:56 PM -- Dave Montez, Executive Director of One Colorado, spoke in opposition to the bill. He stated that student groups can already meet and control their own membership and leaders by meeting off campus at religious institutions. He stated that the state should not sanction or support groups that discriminate. He told the committee that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) student organizations are often gay-straight alliances, where straight members actively participate and lead.

04:59 PM -- Carol Braun, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill.

05:00 PM -- Pamela Hirshman, representing the Anti-Defamation League, spoke in opposition to the bill. She spoke about how the bill would allow for discriminatory practices by student organizations and how the bill would impact campus groups. She told the committee taxpayer funding should not support discriminatory practices.

05:04 PM -- Daniel Allen, representing himself, spoke in opposition to the bill. He discussed his view that the bill will provide discriminatory groups with state-funded support. He discussed his experiences as a gay student on campus. He discussed the supports available to student groups, including meeting space and communications channels, among others. He discussed his payment of tuition and fees, and his opposition to using those funds to support discriminatory groups.

05:08 PM -- John Putnam, representing Jubilee Ministries of the Episcopal Diocese, discussed his experiences at Vanderbilt University. He discussed religion being used to justify discrimination and urged the committee to vote against the bill. Mr. Putnam responded to questions from the committee.

05:26 PM

The committee recessed.

05:41 PM

The committee came back to order. Representative Priola offered closing comments to the bill. He spoke about the First Amendment. Committee discussion ensued.


BILL:	HB15-1037
TIME:	05:47:22 PM
MOVED:	Priola
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 15-1037 to the Committee of the Whole. The motion failed on a vote of 5-6.
SECONDED:	Everett
		VOTE
	Everett	Yes
	Fields	No
	Garnett	No
	Lee	No
	Lundeen	Yes
	Moreno	No
	Priola	Yes
	Wilson	Yes
	Windholz	Yes
	Pettersen	No
	Buckner	No

YES: 5 NO: 6 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL

05:48 PM


BILL:	HB15-1037
TIME:	05:48:22 PM
MOVED:	Moreno
MOTION:	Postpone House Bill 15-1037 indefinitely. The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Fields
		VOTE
	Everett	No
	Fields	Yes
	Garnett	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Lundeen	No
	Moreno	Yes
	Priola	No
	Wilson	No
	Windholz	No
	Pettersen	Yes
	Buckner	Yes

Final YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

05:49 PM -- HB15-1108

Representative Lundeen, sponsor, presented House Bill 15-1108, which codifies the protections afforded to student data. He discussed his own educational experiences and how the advent of digital data has created risks to privacy. He discussed an amendment he will be offering, and its provisions. He talked about the need for deleting data, the need for restricting the transfer of data to third parties and the need for binding the transfer based on specific purposes. He discussed the bill's acknowledgement of local control and how the bill allows parents to prohibit the transfer of their student's data to any party outside the district. Representative Lundeen responded to questions from the committee.

06:00 PM

The following people testified:

06:00 PM -- Jane Urschel, representing the Colorado Association of School Boards (CASB), spoke in opposition to the bill. She discussed the needs of school boards and stated that assessments and surveys provide needed information to schools and districts. She disclosed her opposition to the parental opt-out provisions, but that she would support a more measured approach to the issue if the bill were to place more burden on vendors. Ms. Urschel responded to questions from the committee.

06:14 PM

Committee discussion ensued.

06:15 PM -- Lisa Escarcega, representing the Colorado Association of School Executives (CASE), spoke in opposition to the bill. She discussed the bill's provisions and its lack of definitions. She discussed the needs of her students and her district. She gave examples of unintended consequences and discussed the bill's impact on the October student count, special education funding, and the transfer of student records.

06:20 PM -- Callan Clark, representing the Consortium of Directors of Special Education, spoke in opposition to the bill. She discussed the specific language in the bill and its unintended consequences. She discussed the challenges involved in implementing the provisions of the bill relating to special education, particularly those provisions that impact mental health services and students with disabilities. She mentioned the bill's provision for the destruction of records when a student turns 18 and how that would impact disabled students, whose age of majority is 21.

06:27 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

06:31 PM -- Dr. Allison Shupe, representing the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), spoke in opposition to the bill. She distributed information garnered from the Healthy Kids Colorado survey (Attachment F). She discussed the needs of the department to conduct surveys, how surveys are conducted, how data are maintained, how data are shared, and the fact that responses are not personally identifiable.

15HouseEd0209AttachF.pdf

06:34 PM -- Anne Marie Braga, representing CDPHE, discussed the programmatic impacts of the bill. She talked about the data that CDPHE receives from surveys, and how communities and state and local agencies all use survey results to best meet the needs of youth and change their lives. She discussed the survey and its results and how it helps the state understand depression and suicidal thoughts among Colorado youth.

06:38 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

06:44 PM -- Laurel Flahive, representing herself, spoke about the bill. She discussed the need to collect personal and private information. She discussed data mining and posited that it diminishes parents' authority.

06:47 PM -- Deanna Miller, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed surveys a teacher-friend had participated in. She discussed the varying needs for parental permission She spoke about Teaching Strategies Gold.

06:51 PM -- Toni Walker, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She spoke about the ability of schools and districts to share data, and her fears about data being shared and sold. She discussed the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and stated that there is an exception in that law to allow companies to sell data collected from children in the classroom. She stated that classrooms are the venue for data laundering. She commented on data-sharing among state departments.

06:55 PM -- Gabriel Sampayo, representing himself, spoke in favor of the bill. He told the committee about a survey he took in school. He discussed his rights and how he was threatened with a failing grade for not taking the survey in school. He handed out a packet of information, including copy of the survey he took (Attachment G).

15HouseEd0209AttachG.pdf

07:01 PM -- Mary Senora, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed her work as a marriage and family therapist and her educational background. She went over a copy of the Healthy Kids Colorado Survey (Attachment H). She discussed the challenges in finding suicidal students out of an anonymous survey and questioned the rationale behind conducting research on suicide or depression anonymously. She stated that the survey is coercive and children feel intimidated. She discussed the need for increased privacy protections.

07:06 PM -- Tracy Burnett, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed the nature of privacy and said that privacy is not about the protection of data, but rather about governmental authorities not collecting data in the first place. She stated that the questions on the Healthy Kids survey (Attachment H) are not age-appropriate for her child, who is 11 years old. She stated that the survey gave him the idea to sniff glue. Ms. Burnett responded to questions from the committee.

15HouseEd0209AttachH.pdf

07:13 PM -- Jason Hopfer, representing Douglas County School District, delivered testimony for Robert Ross, the Legal Counsel for the district. He discussed the bill's alignment with the philosophy of the district. Mr. Hopfer responded to questions from the committee. He stated that the suicide assessment and threat assessment are taken seriously by school districts and argued that those assessments would not be affected by this bill.

07:16 PM -- Jillian Moster, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She spoke about her children and their enrollment in Douglas County schools. She discussed her 10 year old's experience in the classroom in a lesson on empathy. She urged the committee to vote in favor of the bill.

07:21 PM -- Cheri Kiesecker, representing herself, spoke in favor of the bill. She spoke about big data and big money, and contrasted herself to those interests. She discussed her wish for an opt-out for parents. She told the committee that the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) told her she was not authorized to see her children's data under the Family Educational Records Privacy Act (FERPA). Ms. Kiesecker responded to questions from the committee. She stated that data is collected so companies can make billions of dollars from kids' data. She stated that FERPA does not cover data because the law is 40 years old. She continued to respond to questions from the committee.

07:31 PM -- Donna Jack, representing herself, spoke about the bill. She discussed Jefferson County and InBloom. She discussed data uploads. She discussed her work in schools in the 1980s, and how education has changed in the last 30 years with the addition of Individual Education Plans (IEPs). She argued that teaching should not be individual. She discussed the pressure on teachers and the addition of a dashboard and how that makes data sharing too easy. She discussed the intimacy of the questions asked of children.

07:35 PM -- Deborah Cole, representing herself, spoke in favor of the bill. She told the committee she thinks parents should be worried about the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) assessments. She discussed CDE's definition of postsecondary and workforce readiness (PWR). She discussed the skills expected of children under PWR and Common Core.

07:40 PM -- Elizabeth Berg, representing herself, spoke in favor of the bill. She discussed her experience as the principal of a charter school. She discussed the wedge between parents and CDE and how schools are told to encourage children to violate the wishes of their parents. She discussed her instructions from CDE explicitly stating that children may not opt out of state assessments. She discussed the state assessment requirements, and gag orders placed on assessment proctors. She discussed her feelings of powerlessness as an administrator. Ms. Berg responded to questions from the committee.

07:48 PM -- Kanda Calef, representing herself, spoke in favor of the bill. She discussed privacy concerns, particularly as they relate to children. She discussed opt-in vs. opt-out options for parents. She discussed her school's participation in Teaching Strategies Gold, and how only some children are picked to participate or to take certain assessments.

07:52 PM -- Jennifer Butts, representing herself, spoke in favor of the bill. She discussed the need to protect children's data. She spoke about assessments. She spoke about the equal need for regulating nonprofits and vendors.

07:57 PM -- Bethany Drosendahl, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed her work on the state Standards and Assessments Task Force and spoke about parents not having questions answered by CDE. She urged the committee to pass the bill.

08:00 PM -- Jess Loben, representing himself, spoke in support of the bill. He discussed his experience in information management. He discussed his children's experiences and threats of withholding of educational services based on his exercising of parental rights. He spoke against districts' earlier assertion that each parental opt-out questionnaire costs money. He discussed his reluctance for any agency - state, nonprofit, or vendor - to have data on his children.

08:04 PM -- Carol Morenz, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed the protection of privacy.

08:08 PM -- Cindy Begones, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed her son's experiences taking surveys in school.

08:11 PM -- Sarah Sampayo, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed CASB's support of the bill, a letter from the United States Department of Education to Commissioner Hammond, questions on the ACT, and the Healthy Kids survey. She read questions from the Healthy Kids Survey. She spoke about the right of parents to opt out. She discussed the history of the Democratic party. She discussed her son's testimony earlier. Ms. Sampayo responded to questions from the committee. She discussed ICAP requirements and distributed a packet of information to the committee (Attachment I).

15HouseEd0209AttachI.pdf

08:21 PM

Representative Lundeen introduced amendment L.002 (Attachment J), which removes the 85 percent threshhold for conducting a survey. Representative Lundeen responded to questions from the committee.

15HouseEd0209AttachJ.pdf


BILL:	HB15-1108
TIME:	08:23:47 PM
MOVED:	Lundeen
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment J). The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Wilson
		VOTE
	Everett	Yes
	Fields	No
	Garnett	Yes
	Lee	No
	Lundeen	Yes
	Moreno	No
	Priola	Yes
	Wilson	Yes
	Windholz	Yes
	Pettersen	No
	Buckner	No

YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

08:29 PM


BILL:	HB15-1108
TIME:	08:29:55 PM
MOVED:	Lundeen
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 15-1108, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations. The motion failed on a vote of 5-6.
SECONDED:	Everett
		VOTE
	Everett	Yes
	Fields	No
	Garnett	No
	Lee	No
	Lundeen	Yes
	Moreno	No
	Priola	Yes
	Wilson	Yes
	Windholz	Yes
	Pettersen	No
	Buckner	No

YES: 5 NO: 6 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL

08:42 PM


BILL:	HB15-1108
TIME:	08:42:58 PM
MOVED:	Moreno
MOTION:	Postpone House Bill 15-1108 indefinitely. The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Lee
		VOTE
	Everett	No
	Fields	Yes
	Garnett	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Lundeen	No
	Moreno	Yes
	Priola	No
	Wilson	No
	Windholz	No
	Pettersen	Yes
	Buckner	Yes

Final YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

08:44 PM -- HB15-1199

Representative Everett, sponsor, presented House Bill 15-1199, which creates the Student and Teacher Data Privacy Act. The bill enacts new restrictions on data collection, processing, and storage from kindergarten through twelfth grade. Representative Everett discussed the need to protect data and the need to allow parents more control over their children's data, and more control for teachers over their own data.

08:49 PM

The following people testified on the bill:

08:51 PM -- Jillian Moster, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed the need to protect children from the collection of data. She discussed the legitimacy of the data collected by CDE. She talked about the dangers to children. She discussed a recent meeting with CDE, the Attorney General's office, and parents.

08:55 PM -- Cheri Kiesecker, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She spoke about schools and districts not fully aware of the data collected, and described how schools sometimes negotiate their own information technology contracts and do not fully provide for children's privacy. She described her experiences with CDE and violations of COPPA and FERPA. Ms. Kiesecker responded to questions from the committee.

09:02 PM -- Lisa Escarcega, representing CASE, spoke in opposition to the bill. She stated that CASE members support attempts to minimize the risks surrounding data collection. She argued that the data collected by the state and districts is required to improve programs for at-risk students and minority populations.

09:05 PM -- Callan Clark, representing Consortium of Directors of Special Education, spoke in opposition to the bill. She recognized the need to protect student privacy, but stated that the bill at hand has unintended consequences for students with disabilities. She discussed her concerns with the specificity of the bill's language and its impact on the needs of students with disabilities. She discussed the need to ask children about access to guns as part of risk and threat assessments.

09:09 PM

The preceding two witnesses responded to questions from the committee.

09:15 PM -- Eliza Schultz, representing CDPHE, spoke in opposition to the bill. She reiterated her agency's concerns about the need to collect public health data in anonymous surveys to ensure the agency's efforts are working. Ms. Schultz responded to questions from the committee.

09:22 PM -- Anita Stapleton, representing herself, spoke about the bill. She spoke in favor of protecting the privacy of students, parents, and teachers. She spoke about the responsibilities of states under FERPA. She spoke about a packet she distributed to the committee (Attachment K). She spoke about FERPA and described federal overreach.

15HouseEd0209AttachK.pdf

09:28 PM -- Deanna Miller, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. She discussed the agreements teachers are required to sign as proctors of PARCC and CMAS assessments.

09:32 PM -- Jess Loban, representing himself, spoke in support of the bill. He spoke about the bill's provisions and how he feels it is a common-sense approach. He discussed the punitive aspects of the bill.

09:35 PM -- Donna Jack, representing herself, spoke about the bill.

09:39 PM

Representative Everett offered closing comments to the bill. He discussed the concerns of parents and teachers. Representative Everett responded to questions from the committee.

09:46 PM


BILL:	HB15-1199
TIME:	09:48:47 PM
MOVED:	Everett
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment L). The motion passed without objection. 15HouseEd0209AttachL.pdf
SECONDED:	Priola
		VOTE
	Everett
	Fields
	Garnett
	Lee
	Lundeen
	Moreno
	Priola
	Wilson
	Windholz
	Pettersen
	Buckner

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection

09:50 PM

Representative Everett introduced L.002 (Attachment M), which exempts the Office of the State Auditor from the bill.

15HouseEd0209AttachM.pdf


BILL:	HB15-1199
TIME:	09:50:45 PM
MOVED:	Everett
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment M). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Wilson
		VOTE
	Everett
	Fields
	Garnett
	Lee
	Lundeen
	Moreno
	Priola
	Wilson
	Windholz
	Pettersen
	Buckner

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection

09:51 PM

Representative Everett introduced amendment L.003 (Attachment N), which clarifies the parental consent provisions of the bill.

15HouseEd0209AttachN.pdf


BILL:	HB15-1199
TIME:	09:52:32 PM
MOVED:	Everett
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment N). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Lundeen
		VOTE
	Everett
	Fields
	Garnett
	Lee
	Lundeen
	Moreno
	Priola
	Wilson
	Windholz
	Pettersen
	Buckner

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection

09:53 PM


BILL:	HB15-1199
TIME:	09:53:20 PM
MOVED:	Everett
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 15-1199, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations. The motion failed on a vote of 5-6.
SECONDED:	Priola
		VOTE
	Everett	Yes
	Fields	No
	Garnett	No
	Lee	No
	Lundeen	Yes
	Moreno	No
	Priola	Yes
	Wilson	Yes
	Windholz	Yes
	Pettersen	No
	Buckner	No

YES: 5 NO: 6 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL

09:54 PM


BILL:	HB15-1199
TIME:	09:54:35 PM
MOVED:	Moreno
MOTION:	Postpone House Bill 15-1199 indefinitely. The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Fields
		VOTE
	Everett	No
	Fields	Yes
	Garnett	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Lundeen	No
	Moreno	Yes
	Priola	No
	Wilson	No
	Windholz	No
	Pettersen	Yes
	Buckner	Yes

Final YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

09:55 PM

Representative Buckner addressed the committee about efficiency in committee work.

09:56 PM

The committee adjourned.