Colorado Legislative Council Staff
STATE
CONDITIONAL FISCAL IMPACT
Drafting Number: Prime Sponsor(s): |
LLS 99-0891 Sen. Pascoe |
Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: |
April 28, 1999 Senate SVMA Harry Zeid (303-866-4753) |
TITLE: CONCERNING THE REPEAL OF THE STATUTORY LIMITATION ON STATE GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS WITHOUT AFFECTING THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING ESTABLISHED IN THE CONSTITUTION.
Fiscal Impact Summary |
FY 1999/2000 |
FY 2000/2001 |
State Revenues General Fund |
|
|
State Expenditures General Fund |
|
|
FTE Position Change |
0.0 FTE |
0.0 FTE |
Other State Impact: Election costs |
||
Effective Date: Upon proclamation of approval by the voters. |
||
Appropriation Summary for FY 1999-2000: |
||
Local Government Impact: None |
Summary of Legislation
This bill would submit a measure to the registered electors of the state at the 1999 General Election to repeal the statutory limitation on state General Fund appropriations, commonly known as the "Arveschoug-Bird Amendment", after FY 1999-00, without affecting the limitation on state fiscal year spending established in the State Constitution.
State Revenues
State revenues would be unaffected by the bill.
State Expenditures
The current statutory restriction on state appropriations limits total state General Fund appropriations to moneys necessary for reappraisals of any class or classes of taxable property for property tax purposes as required by Section 39-1-105.5, C.R.S., plus the lesser of:
• an amount equal to 5.0 percent of Colorado personal income; or
• 6.0 percent over the total state General Fund appropriations for the previous fiscal year.
The bill would ask the registered electors of the state to repeal this statutory limitation. All other things being equal, if approved by the voters, the change would increase the amount of General Fund money that the General Assembly would be allowed to appropriate, but would not require the General Assembly to appropriate additional funds for any purpose. Any additional state General Fund appropriations would reduce the amount of money in the General Fund reserve by a corresponding amount.
Departments Contacted
Legislative Council Staff