Colorado Legislative Council Staff

LOCAL

REVISED FISCAL IMPACT

(replaces fiscal impact dated January 23, 1999)

No State General Fund Impact

Drafting Number:

Prime Sponsor(s):

LLS 99-0361

Sen. Congrove

Rep. Paschall

Date:

Bill Status:

Fiscal Analyst:

February 15, 1999

Senate Appropriations

Steve Tammeus (866-2756)

 

TITLE:            CONCERNING THE ACCURACY OF THE PROPERTY TAX VALUATION PROCESS, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, REQUIRING NOTICES OF VALUATION TO INCLUDE SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.



Fiscal Impact Summary

FY 1999/2000

FY 2000/2001

State Revenues

General Fund

 


 

State Expenditures

General Fund

 


 

FTE Position Change

0.0 FTE

0.0 FTE

Other State Impact: None

Effective Date: Upon signature of the Governor.

Appropriation Summary for FY 1999-2000: None

Local Government Impact: County assessors may incur additional costs to provide additional information on the notice of valuation provided to property owners.



Summary of Legislation


            This bill, as amended by the Senate Local Government Committee, February 9, 1999, revises the content of the notice of valuation provided by the assessor of each county, effective January 1,2001. The bill specifies that for the first year of each reassessment cycle, the notice shall provide an itemized listing of the land, improvements, and their characteristics.



Local Government Impact


            The assessors of each county currently have access to the information that is required to be included in each notice of valuation (NOV) for the first year of each reassessment cycle. A reassessment cycle is two years, therefore, this information would be required on every NOV every other year, starting January 1, 2001.


            The costs for each county to include the required information on every NOV is dependent upon the manner in which each county assessor currently records and maintains the information, and how that information will be transferred to the NOV.


            Some counties may utilize computer systems to prepare the NOV for distribution to property owners, while other counties may manually prepare the NOV. Of those counties that utilize computer systems, some may contract with vendors to provide computer programming services on an as-needed basis, some may have vendors under contract to maintain systems on an on-going basis, and some may have staff personnel capable of making system modifications.


            The costs for each county to provide this information on each NOV is also dependent upon the number of properties within the county and the diversity of the property types within the county.

            Arapahoe and Jefferson counties indicate they currently plan to provide this information on every NOV, however, the results of a recent survey indicate the remaining counties are not currently planning on providing this information. That survey also indicated that a few of those counties may be able to provide the required information at little or no additional costs, while the majority of those counties may be required to expend from $1,000 to $12,000 in computer reprogramming costs.


            This fiscal note assumes these costs will be a one-time start up cost, with minimal recurring annual costs to maintain or update the information. This fiscal note cannot assess whether those costs can be absorbed within existing operating budgets that are approved by each board of county commissioners.



State Appropriations


            This fiscal note would imply no new state appropriations are required for FY 1999-2000.



Departments Contacted

 

            Local Affairs              Legislative Council Staff