House Committee on Judiciary (02/27/2014)

Final
STAFF SUMMARY OF MEETING

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

Date:	02/27/2014	ATTENDANCE

Time:	01:33 PM to 09:22 PM	Buckner	X
		Court	X
Place:	HCR 0112	Gardner	X
		Lawrence	X
This Meeting was called to order by		McLachlan	X
	Representative Kagan	Murray	X
		Pettersen	X
This Report was prepared by		Salazar	*
	Bo Pogue	Waller	X
		Lee	X
		Kagan	X
		X = Present, E = Excused, A = Absent, * = Present after roll call

Bills Addressed:		Action Taken:
HB14-1104 HB14-1162 SB14-059 HB14-1032		Postponed Indefinitely Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only Amended, Referred to the Committee of the Whole Amended, Referred to Appropriations

01:33 PM -- HB14-1104

The committee was called to order. A quorum was present. Representative Stephens, prime sponsor, presented House Bill 14-1104, concerning prohibiting publishing intimate photographs of an underage person on the Internet for revenge. Representative Stephens requested that the bill be postponed indefinitely, and explained her reasons for doing so.


BILL:	HB14-1104
TIME:	01:34:20 PM
MOVED:	Gardner
MOTION:	Postpone House Bill 14-1104 indefinitely. The motion passed on a vote of 10-0.
SECONDED:	Court
		VOTE
	Buckner	Yes
	Court	Yes
	Gardner	Yes
	Lawrence	Yes
	McLachlan	Yes
	Murray	Yes
	Pettersen	Yes
	Salazar	Excused
	Waller	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Kagan	Yes

Final YES: 10 NO: 0 EXC: 1 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

01:35 PM -- HB14-1162

The committee recessed.

01:40 PM

The committee returned to order. Representative Landgraf, prime sponsor, presented House Bill 14-1162, concerning protection of the victim of a sexual assault in cases where a child was conceived as a result of the sexual assault, and, in connection therewith, making legislative changes in response to the study by and the report of the recommendations from the Task Force on Children Conceived Through Rape. Representative Landgraf provided background on the bill's creation, referencing Senate Bill 13-227, which created a process for termination of parental rights and created the task force. She also explained the effect of House Bill 14-1162, confining her explanation of the bill to amendment L.009 (Attachment A), a strike-below amendment. Representative Landgraf discussed the work of the task force created by Senate Bill 13-227, and explained how the work of the task force resulted in the drafting of House Bill 14-1162.

14HseJud0227AttachA.pdf

01:49 PM

The following persons testified regarding House Bill 14-1162:

01:50 PM -- Ms. Karen Moldovan, representing the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault and the Task Force on Children Conceived Through Rape, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Moldovan discussed the need for the legislation, citing statistics on rape in the United States. Ms. Moldovan discussed children who are conceived as a result of rape, and the impact that having a child conceived through such circumstances has on a family. She discussed Senate Bill 13-227, and clarified the effect of House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Moldovan discussed legislation similar to House Bill 14-1162 that has been enacted in other states, and continued to explain the effect of the bill.

02:00 PM

Ms. Moldovan continued to explain the effect of House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Moldovan responded to questions regarding the time frame within which a parent of a child conceived by rape may petition to terminate parental rights. Ms. Moldovan responded to further questions regarding how the conception of a child from a sexual assault would be determined in the absence of a criminal conviction, and safeguards in the bill against potentially false claims of sexual assault. Discussion returned to the time frame for petitioning to terminate parental rights under the bill.

02:11 PM

Discussion continued regarding the safeguards in the bill against the pursuit of false claims of rape. Ms. Moldovan responded to questions regarding the potential for the bill to be amended to address the support responsibilities of a person whose parental responsibilities have been terminated under the bill. Ms. Moldovan responded to questions regarding the impact of the bill on criminal procedure. Ms. Amy Miller, representing the Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence and the Task Force on Children Conceived Through Rape, also testified in support of the bill. Ms. Miller provided background on sexual assault in intimate partnerships, as well as reproductive coercion. Ms. Miller explained the effect of certain provisions in House Bill 14-1162.

02:25 PM

Ms. Miller continued to explain the effect of certain provisions of the bill, and the discussed input of the task force on these provisions. Ms. Miller discussed the process of drafting amendment L.009, and noted the factors that a court may consider when determining the best interests of the child under the bill.

02:37 PM

Ms. Miller addressed the statute of limitations questions raised during earlier testimony. Discussion ensued on this point. Discussion followed regarding input the Task Force on Children Conceived Through Rape received during its deliberations.

02:40 PM -- Ms. Marie Moses, representing the Colorado Bar Association, testified in opposition to House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Moses discussed some potential constitutional issues with the bill, and questioned the drawing of a distinction between terminations of parental rights based on a sexual assault and other violent crimes. Ms. Moses discussed the deliberations that took place in the Task Force on Children Conceived Through Rape on the threshold for revoking the decision-making responsibility of a parent under the bill, and explained why this section of the bill is problematic. Ms. Moses took issue with another provision in the bill concerning restriction of parenting time.

02:57 PM

Ms. Moses responded to questions regarding the circumstances under which a court may modify parenting time under the bill, and the legal standards applicable to such modification. Discussion ensued regarding how provisions concerning the modification of parenting time were incorporated into the bill. Discussion followed regarding the Colorado Bar Association's objection regarding these provisions.

03:09 PM

Discussion continued regarding the potential for amending amendment L.009 to address the Colorado Bar Association's concerns regarding the bill's parenting time provisions. Discussion ensued regarding the potential for the Colorado Bar Association to further vet amendment L.009 with other stakeholders for potential issues. Discussion followed regarding the stakeholder process already undertaken in drafting amendment L.009.

03:17 PM -- Ms. Dorothy Macias, representing the Office of the Child's Representative, testified in support of House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Macias was joined by Ms. Miller. Ms. Macias discussed the input her office provided in the stakeholder process for the bill, and the complexity of the issues being dealt with by the bill. Ms. Macias discussed fundamental parenting rights, and explained how the bill treats these parenting rights. Ms. Macias responded to questions regarding the "gatekeeper process" created by the bill for protecting a child under circumstances where the child is conceived from a rape. Ms. Macias responded to questions regarding the provision for the best interests of the child in family law proceedings.

03:33 PM

Ms. Miller provided clarification regarding the process by which amendment L.009 was drafted, and addressed concerns raised about language in the amendment concerning parenting time modification. Discussion ensued regarding the potential for addressing other concerns raised by Ms. Moses.

03:42 PM -- Ms. Maureen Cain, representing the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, testified on the bill from a neutral position. Ms. Cain identified some issues with amendment L.009 that were discussed by Ms. Moses. Ms. Cain suggested amending the bill to address concerns raised earlier about the lack of a time limit for petitioning to terminate parental rights. Discussion ensued regarding certain circumstances to which the bill pertains that are outside the scope of a violent sexual assault.

03:53 PM

Ms. Cain continued to identify issues with amendment L.009. Ms. Cain responded to questions regarding good cause for delaying a petition to terminate a parent-child relationship. Ms. Cain responded to questions regarding a statute of limitations for establishing paternity in Colorado law, and the potential for amendment L.009 to run afoul of this statute of limitations. Discussion ensued regarding a provision in the bill limiting the delay in a petition hearing on a parent-child relationship.

04:04 PM -- Ms. Gabby and Mr. David, representing themselves, testified in support of the bill. They discussed their experiences as the mother and psychological father of a child conceived in sexual assault, and explained why the bill would be of benefit to people in situations similar to theirs. Discussion ensued regarding the options available for families in these situations.

04:14 PM -- Ms. Andrea Popelka, representing herself, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Popelka discussed the abusive circumstances under which she formerly resided, and the trauma that her children have experienced as a result. She explained that the abuse continued after divorce through the parental visitation process, and discussed the pain that she endured. She explained that she hoped the passage of House Bill 14-1162 will assist those in situations similar to hers.

04:20 PM -- Ms. Agueda Morgan, representing Moving to End Sexual Assault, testified in support of House Bill 14-1162. She discussed the services provided to the victims of sexual assault by her organization, and explained that those who have committed a sexual assault resulting in a child should not have parental rights. She discussed the impact of such situations on the victims, and provided examples of the difficulties experienced by these victims, particularly in the area of accessing legal assistance. She spoke about the possibility that a mother would be bullied or threatened by her rapist. She indicated that the bill would support the best interests of the child.

04:27 PM -- Ms. Michelle Spradling, representing the Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Ms. Deborah Cantrell, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Spradling read testimony from Ms. Cantrell on this issue. Ms. Cantrell is a law professor who works in the area of family law. Ms. Cantrell's testimony discussed the case of a woman who gave birth to a child conceived through rape and who is now facing child custody proceedings. Ms. Cantrell's testimony highlighted important provisions of House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Spradling responded to questions regarding the case highlighted in Ms. Cantrell's testimonial, and the frequency of the claim of consent on the part of the alleged attacker in cases where a child is conceived due to an alleged sexual assault.

04:37 PM -- Ms. Darla Stuart, representing the Arc of Aurora and Family Voices, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Stuart discussed the predation of women with disabilities, and explained that parents with disabilities are disproportionately separated from their children through court proceedings. She explained how House Bill 14-1162 will help to mitigate such circumstances.

04:40 PM -- Ms. Nancy Lewis, representing the Colorado Organization for Victim Assistance, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Lewis spoke to the merits of the bill, but explained that the bill does not go far enough to ensure the rights of the victims in situations where a child results from a sexual assault.

04:43 PM -- Ms. Valine Demos, representing herself, testified in support of House Bill 14-1162. Ms. Demos explained that she was kidnapped and raped during her military service, and one of the men who assaulted her sought custody of the child that resulted. She spoke against maintaining parental rights for those attackers who have conceived a child through sexual assault and explained how the bill would assist those victims who have given birth to a child resulting from rape.

04:51 PM

Representative Kagan laid the bill over for action only. Representative Landgraf explained that she would solicit stakeholder input on further potential amendments to House Bill 14-1162.

04:53 PM -- SB14-059

The committee recessed.

05:07 PM

The committee returned to order. Representative Lawrence, prime sponsor, presented Senate Bill 14-059, concerning eliminating the statute of limitations for offenses that accompany sex offenses that are not subject to a statute of limitations. Representative Lawrence provided background on cold cases that have been revived through the use of DNA evidence, while accompanying crimes have not been charged due to the tolling of the statute of limitations. Committee members received a news article about a sexual assault cold case that was revived using DNA evidence (Attachment B). Representative Lawrence discussed the need for the legislation.

14HseJud0227AttachB.pdf

05:11 PM

The following persons testified regarding Senate Bill 14-059:

05:11 PM -- Ms. Maureen Cain, representing the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, testified in opposition to the bill. Ms. Cain discussed efforts and forums underway concerning the use of DNA evidence in the justice system, and objected to the bill based on the fact that it addresses the statute of limitations in a limited set of circumstances. She spoke in support of eliminating the statute of limitations for accompanying crimes if the case for the primary crime of sexual assault is not ultimately pursued. Ms. Cain responded to questions regarding the position of the district attorneys on her proposal. Discussion ensued regarding Ms. Cain's proposed amendment to the bill.

05:22 PM

Discussion ensued regarding the impact of the bill on a proposed fact pattern under which numerous individuals commit a burglary but only one of them commits a sexual assault.

05:27 PM -- Mr. Matt Durkin, representing the Attorney General's Office, testified in support of the bill. Mr. Durkin discussed several sexual assault cases that were solved using DNA evidence, but associated crimes could not be prosecuted due to the tolling of the statute of limitations. Mr. Durkin objected to the bill being characterized as a "one-off," and explained that probable cause is built into the bill, the lack of which triggers the statute of limitations on auxiliary crimes. Mr. Durkin discussed the experiences of victims of sexual assault when cases are dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Durkin discussed the use of "John Doe" warrants as an alternative to the bill.

05:38 PM

Mr. Durkin responded to questions regarding the potential creation of a double standard for crimes committed in association with a sexual assault as compared to the same crimes committed in isolation. Mr. Durkin responded to further questions regarding the scope of the bill in terms of the auxiliary crimes to which it applies. Discussion ensued regarding the justification behind the creation of statutes of limitation in general. Discussion returned to the scope of auxiliary crimes covered by the bill.

05:50 PM

Mr. Durkin responded to questions regarding the ability of the prosecution to charge crimes committed for which the statute of limitations has tolled in association with a murder. Mr. Durkin responded to further questions regarding why sexual assault has been singled out by the bill and not other violent crimes. Mr. Durkin responded to questions regarding the inspiration for creating Senate Bill 14-059. Discussion ensued regarding the use of a statute of limitations argument during a recent criminal appeal in Colorado. Mr. Durkin responded to questions regarding the potential to secure plea bargains in sexual assault cases if the bill were to pass.

05:58 PM -- Mr. Mitch Morrissey, representing the Second Judicial District as the District Attorney, testified in support of the bill. Mr. Morrissey addressed the assertion that the bill applies to a limited set of circumstances, and discussed the reasons for the existence of statutes of limitations. Mr. Morrissey discussed the exceptional nature of DNA evidence, and discussed a case solved through the cold case program. He compared the statutes of limitations for various crimes, and argued in support of the exception created by the bill. Discussion ensued regarding the narrow circumstances covered by the bill. Discussion followed regarding the use of DNA to prosecute physicians for sexual assault.

06:11 PM -- Mr. Steve Siegel, representing the Colorado Organization for Victim Assistance, testified in support of Senate Bill 14-059. Mr. Siegel discussed the nature of sexual assault.

06:13 PM -- Mr. Arnold Hanuman, representing the Colorado District Attorneys' Council, testified in support of the bill. Mr. Hanuman explained that the cases to which the bill would apply are exclusive to situations where the identification of an alleged perpetrator is not known. Mr. Hanuman addressed issues raised during previous testimony, and spoke in support of prosecuting all of the criminal activity associated with a sexual assault. Mr. Hanuman responded to questions regarding potential doubt cast upon a conviction for an associated crime under the bill when the primary charge of sexual assault does not result in a conviction. Discussion ensued regarding the utility of statutes of limitations.

06:25 PM

Discussion ensued regarding the impact of forthcoming amendment L.005 (Attachment C). Mr. Durkin returned to further clarify the effect of the amendment.

14HseJud0227AttachC.pdf

06:30 PM -- Ms. Hanni Raley, representing the Arc of Colorado, testified in support of Senate Bill 14-059. Ms. Raley discussed the abuse experienced by persons with disabilities.

06:33 PM -- Ms. Diane Breece, representing herself, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Breece discussed her experience as the victim of a violent sexual assault, during which the assailant committed other crimes. The assailant was later found through the use of DNA evidence, but sentencing for the non-sexual assault crimes was barred by the statute of limitations. She urged the passage of the bill to hold perpetrators of sexual assault accountable for all of their crimes. Ms. Breece responded to questions regarding the sentence her assailant received.

06:39 PM

Representative Kagan explained the effect of prepared amendment L.006 (Attachment D). Discussion ensued regarding the effect of the amendment. Members of the committee voiced their positions on the amendment, and discussed the potential implications of the amendment.

14HseJud0227AttachD.pdf


BILL:	SB14-059
TIME:	06:40:19 PM
MOVED:	Kagan
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.006 (Attachment D). The motion failed for lack of a second.
SECONDED:
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Failed


BILL:	SB14-059
TIME:	06:57:11 PM
MOVED:	Lawrence
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.005 (Attachment C). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Court
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection

06:57 PM

Representative Lawrence provided closing remarks in support of Senate Bill 14-059. Committee members discussed the merits of the legislation, and voiced their positions on it.


BILL:	SB14-059
TIME:	06:58:24 PM
MOVED:	Lawrence
MOTION:	Refer Senate Bill 14-059, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole. The motion passed on a vote of 11-0.
SECONDED:	Murray
		VOTE
	Buckner	Yes
	Court	Yes
	Gardner	Yes
	Lawrence	Yes
	McLachlan	Yes
	Murray	Yes
	Pettersen	Yes
	Salazar	Yes
	Waller	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Kagan	Yes

Final YES: 11 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

07:02 PM -- HB14-1032

The committee recessed.

07:12 PM

The committee returned to order. Representative Kagan, prime sponsor, presented House Bill 14-1032, concerning the provision of defense counsel to juvenile offenders. Representative Kagan discussed the creation of the legislation, and explained its need. Representative Kagan explained the effect of amendment L.002 (Attachment E), a strike-below amendment. Committee members received a packet of background information supporting the bill (Attachment F).

14HseJud0227AttachE.pdf

14HseJud0227AttachF.pdf

07:23 PM

Representative Kagan continued to explain the effect of amendment L.002. He also discussed the effect of an additional forthcoming amendment to amendment L.002. Representative Kagan responded to questions regarding the fiscal note for the bill, and the potential impact of the bill on juvenile diversion programs.

07:31 PM

The following persons testified regarding House Bill 14-1032:

07:31 PM -- Mr. Doug Wilson, State Public Defender, testified in support of the bill. Mr. Wilson discussed the juvenile caseload in Colorado, and the burdens his office experiences in providing counsel in these cases considering available resources and distances to hearing sites. Mr. Wilson discussed the use of diversion programs for juveniles. Mr. Wilson noted certain organizations that support the bill. Discussion ensued regarding the fiscal impact of the bill as amended, and the assignment of additional personnel from his office under the bill. Mr. Wilson responded to questions regarding the constitutional necessity of the bill in terms of providing counsel in juvenile cases.

07:43 PM

Mr. Wilson responded to questions regarding the potential outcomes in the area of juvenile justice if the bill passes, and his office's duties in the area of juvenile case appeals.

07:45 PM -- Ms. Wana Daniel, Judge Tijani Cole, and Ms. Briceida Macias testified in support of the bill. Ms. Macias explained that the bill will help to protect the rights of children. Ms. Daniel supported the right of juveniles to have attorneys in court proceedings, and discussed disparate treatment of minority youth. Judge Cole discussed his background as a judge and in other endeavors serving children, and explained how these activities have given him insight into juvenile delinquency matters. He discussed the benefits of juveniles being represented in court proceedings, and explained that youth do not understand what is going on during these proceedings. He further explained that those youth with limited resources are the ones who do not have counsel in legal proceedings, and rebutted potential arguments against providing counsel to juveniles in court proceedings.

07:55 PM

Judge Cole discussed the disparate treatment of minority youth by the court system, and explained how defense counsel may help to ameliorate this disparate treatment. Discussion ensued regarding the potential violation of the constitution in recent decades by the state not providing counsel to juvenile defendants. Representative Salazar discussed the merits of the bill in terms of providing equal representation to certain populations.

08:03 PM -- Ms. Karen Steinhauser, representing herself, testified in support of House Bill 14-1032. Ms. Steinhauser addressed questions raised earlier about the changing landscape of juvenile justice, and potential constitutional issues surrounding the current lack of counsel for juvenile defendants. Ms. Steinhauser discussed the constitutional protections afforded to minors, and the proper authority for ensuring that juveniles are afforded these protections. Ms. Steinhauser addressed misperceptions regarding the expungement of juvenile court records, and the role of counsel in assisting youth in such matters. She discussed collateral consequences attendant to juvenile delinquency.

08:14 PM

Ms. Steinhauser continued to discuss the benefits of juvenile defendants receiving counsel during court proceedings. Ms. Steinhauser responded to questions regarding the use of juvenile courts as "training grounds" for aspiring prosecutors, and the incentives for these prosecutors to gain convictions in juvenile courts. Discussion ensued regarding the need for juvenile defendants to receive counsel in these proceedings. Discussion followed regarding the use of diversion programs for juveniles.

08:21 PM -- Ms. Feliciana Lilgerose, representing herself, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Lilgerose discussed the findings of the Juvenile Defense Attorney Interim Committee. She discussed her experiences as the parent of a child involved in the juvenile justice system, and explained that parents should not be put in the position of serving as counsel for children.

08:25 PM -- Former Representative Claire Levy, representing herself, testified in support of House Bill 14-1032. Representative Levy discussed the burdens placed upon parents of children involved in the juvenile justice system, and explained how the provision of juvenile counsel under the bill will benefit in these situations. She discussed the disparity in resources available to juvenile defendants in various parts of the state, and spoke in support of provisions in the bill that increase the threshold for waiving counsel.

08:33 PM -- Judge Jack Smith, representing himself, testified in support of the bill. Judge Smith discussed the history of juvenile justice in Colorado, and his work in the field. Additionally, he discussed the creation of the Colorado Children's Code, and the benefits of providing counsel to juvenile defendants. Judge Smith discussed the costs associated with the bill, and the benefits that juvenile defendants in rural areas will experience under the bill.

08:44 PM -- Ms. Carla Bennett, representing the League of Women Voters, testified in support of House Bill 14-1032. Ms. Bennett expressed concern regarding the lack of availability of defense counsel for juvenile defendants.

08:46 PM -- Ms. Kim Dvorchak, representing the Colorado Juvenile Defender Coalition, testified in support of the bill. Ms. Dvorchak discussed her organization's research in the area of juvenile defense, and explained that the bill is a first step in the adequate provision of counsel to juvenile defendants. Ms. Dvorchak addressed the issue of the use of juvenile diversion programs, and explained that amendment L.002 will not achieve full representation for juvenile defendants. She compared the costs of juvenile incarceration with costs associated with providing counsel to juvenile defendants.

08:52 PM -- Mr. Tom Raynes, Executive Director for the Colorado District Attorneys' Counsel, testified on the bill. Mr. Raynes explained that his organization is taking a neutral position on the bill if it is amended by amendment L.002 and amendment L.008 (Attachment G). Mr. Raynes discussed the differences between the juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system, and explained how the interests of juvenile defendants may be furthered. Mr. Raynes discussed the increasing use of juvenile diversion programs, and the changing landscape of juvenile justice. Mr. Raynes addressed the constitutional issues raised during earlier discussions. Mr. Raynes also addressed comments made earlier by Representative Salazar.

14HseJud0227AttachG.pdf

09:03 PM

Mr. Raynes discussed the potential impact of the bill on the use of juvenile diversion programs, and raised certain potential issues with the bill. Mr. Raynes discussed the potential outcomes of the bill in areas such as diversion and recidivism.


BILL:	HB14-1032
TIME:	09:08:27 PM
MOVED:	Kagan
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment E). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Court
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB14-1032
TIME:	09:10:52 PM
MOVED:	Gardner
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.008 (Attachment G). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Salazar
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB14-1032
TIME:	09:12:10 PM
MOVED:	Gardner
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.011 (Attachment H). The motion passed without objection. 14HseJud0227AttachH.pdf
SECONDED:	Salazar
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB14-1032
TIME:	09:09:05 PM
MOVED:	Kagan
MOTION:	Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment I). The motion was withdrawn. 14HseJud0227AttachI.pdf
SECONDED:	Salazar
		VOTE
	Buckner
	Court
	Gardner
	Lawrence
	McLachlan
	Murray
	Pettersen
	Salazar
	Waller
	Lee
	Kagan

YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Withdrawn


BILL:	HB14-1032
TIME:	09:16:05 PM
MOVED:	Kagan
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 14-1032, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations. The motion passed on a vote of 11-0.
SECONDED:	Court
		VOTE
	Buckner	Yes
	Court	Yes
	Gardner	Yes
	Lawrence	Yes
	McLachlan	Yes
	Murray	Yes
	Pettersen	Yes
	Salazar	Yes
	Waller	Yes
	Lee	Yes
	Kagan	Yes

Final YES: 11 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

09:22 PM

The committee adjourned.