Final
STAFF SUMMARY OF MEETING

COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

Date:09/04/2013
ATTENDANCE
Time:09:06 AM to 12:06 PM
Cadman
X
Carroll
X
Place:HCR 0112
Court
X
DelGrosso
X
This Meeting was called to order by
Grantham
X
Senator Morse
Guzman
X
Hullinghorst
X
This Report was prepared by
Melton
X
Dave DeNovellis
Murray
X
Newell
X
Nicholson
X
Pabon
X
Priola
*
Renfroe
*
Scheffel
X
Szabo
X
Ferrandino
X
Morse
X
X = Present, E = Excused, A = Absent, * = Present after roll call
Bills Addressed: Action Taken:
Introductory Remarks
Proposition AA
Initiative 22
Blue Book Layout		Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only
Amended,
Amended,
Amended,

09:07 AM -- Introductory Remarks

President Morse, chair, called the meeting to order.

Mike Mauer, director of the Legislative Council Staff, gave the committee some introductory remarks regarding the 2013 Colorado Blue Book. Copies of the meeting materials are posted online at the Legislative Council website. He gave an overview of the Blue Book process and noted that it takes 12 votes, two-thirds of the committee membership, to make any changes to the analysis. Mr. Mauer responded to questions from Representative Court and discussed the current layout of the Blue Book and noted that the committee can decide to adjust the layout if it chooses.

09:12 AM -- Proposition AA

Clare Pramuk, Legislative Council Staff, discussed the proposed Blue Book analysis of Proposition AA concerning retail marijuana taxes. She gave the committee an overview of each section of the analysis, including a summary and analysis of the proposed proposition, an estimate of its fiscal impact, and arguments for and against the proposition.




Representative Murray presented prepared Amendment 1 to Proposition AA concerning language discussing retail licenses for medical marijuana stores in the summary and analysis section (Attachment A). The committee discussed whether the existing language was misleading or unnecessary.

130904 AttachA.pdf130904 AttachA.pdf
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:19:50 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 1 to the Proposition AA Final Draft (Attachment A). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:



After committee discussion regarding the use of language concerning medical marijuana, Representative Murray offered a conceptual amendment to remove the language on page 1 concerning medical marijuana. Senator Carroll stated that she feels removing mention of medical marijuana is misleading since only existing medical marijuana stores are eligible licensure on January 1, 2014, while all applicants are potentially eligible after October 1, 2014.
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:25:40 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Amend Proposition AA Final Draft, page 1, strike lines 32 through 34 and substitute "January 1, 2014, retail marijuana stores will be eligible for a retail marijuana license unless a city or county has imposed a ban.". The motion failed on a 9-9 vote.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
No
YES: 9 NO: 9 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: TIE



Representative DelGrosso presented prepared Amendment 2 to Proposition AA concerning language regarding funding for the new regulatory structure in the summary and analysis section (Attachment B). The committee discussed how retail marijuana may be regulated and enforced should the proposition fail.

130904 AttachB.pdf130904 AttachB.pdf
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:32:48 AM
MOVED:DelGrosso
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 2 to the Proposition AA Final Draft (Attachment B). The motion passed on a vote of 18-0.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
Yes
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
Yes
Melton
Yes
Murray
Yes
Newell
Yes
Nicholson
Yes
Pabon
Yes
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
Yes
YES: 18 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS



Representative DelGrosso presented prepared Amendment 4 to Proposition AA concerning the estimated cost of the new regulatory structure (Attachment C). Ms. Pramuk stated that the fiscal information included in the Proposition AA analysis concerns the proposed tax collection and that fiscal information concerning the implementation of the regulatory structure is contained in the fiscal notes for House Bill 13-1317 and Senate Bill 13-283.

130904 AttachC.pdf130904 AttachC.pdf
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:35:22 AM
MOVED:DelGrosso
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 4 to the Proposition AA Final Draft (Attachment C). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:



The committee discussed with Ms. Pramuk the feasibility of separating the costs of implementing the retail marijuana regulatory structure from the medical marijuana regulatory structure, and whether there was a good estimate of what those would be. Ms. Pramuk noted that the annual budget process would also play a significant role in the regulatory system funding. Representative Murray offered a conceptual amendment to address the costs of implementing the retail marijuana regulatory structure.
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:44:15 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Amend Proposition AA Final Draft, page 3, line 24, after "funded." add "The total costs to the state for the implementation of Amendment 64 are projected to be millions of dollars annually.". The motion passed on a vote of 15-3.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
Yes
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
Yes
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
Yes
Nicholson
No
Pabon
Yes
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
Yes
YES: 15 NO: 3 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS



Ms. Pramuk responded to questions from Senator Scheffel concerning the expected projections and fund availability from the Department of Revenue regarding both medical and recreational marijuana. Senator Scheffel presented prepared Amendment 5 concerning language indicating that current fees and sales tax revenue are inadequate to provide an effective regulatory structure (Attachment D). The committee discussed the propriety of using "will not be funded" versus "may not be funded." Senator Scheffel withdrew his motion and offered a motion to amend the final Proposition AA draft with language that includes "may not be funded."

130904 AttachD.pdf130904 AttachD.pdf
BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:49:11 AM
MOVED:Scheffel
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 5 to the Proposition AA Final Draft (Attachment D). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:


BILL:Proposition AA
TIME: 09:54:48 AM
MOVED:Scheffel
MOTION:Amend Proposition AA Final Draft, page 4, line 4, strike "may not be funded." and substitute "may not be adequately funded. As recent audits of the medical marijuana regulatory system have demonstrated, current fees and sales tax revenue may not be adequate to ensure a safe and effective regulatory structure.". The motion passed on a vote of 18-0.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
Yes
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
Yes
Melton
Yes
Murray
Yes
Newell
Yes
Nicholson
Yes
Pabon
Yes
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
Yes
YES: 18 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS




09:58 AM -- Initiative 22

Marc Carey, Legislative Council Staff, presented the proposed Blue Book Analysis for Initiative 22 concerning funding for public schools. He gave the committee an overview of each section of the analysis, including a summary and analysis of the proposed initiative, an estimate of its fiscal impact, and arguments for and against the initiative. Representative Murray presented prepared Amendment 1 concerning adding language regarding mill levy increases to the summary and analysis section (Attachment E).

130904 AttachE.pdf130904 AttachE.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:04:01 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 1 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment E). The motion failed on a 9-9 vote.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 9 NO: 9 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: TIE



Senator Cadman presented prepared Amendment 2 concerning adding language to the summary and analysis section that notes that the recession caused a reduction in revenue for many state programs (Attachment F). Representative Melton stated that local revenue does not pay for state programs and Representative Court said she believes the language in the analysis should only address education. After committee discussion, Senator Cadman withdrew his motion.

130904 AttachF.pdf130904 AttachF.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:07:08 AM
MOVED:Cadman
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 2 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment F). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:



Representative DelGrosso presented prepared Amendment 3 concerning the language on page 3 regarding small businesses and income reporting (Attachment G). The committee discussed the amendment and the various types of business tax structures.

130904 AttachG.pdf130904 AttachG.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:10:46 AM
MOVED:DelGrosso
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 3 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment G). The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



The committee continued to discuss business tax structures. Representative Priola stated that the current language may be misleading to voters who think that businesses may be able to choose different tax structures year to year. Representative Murray moved to strike language in the summary and analysis section about businesses choosing to report income and said that all businesses must report income, but choose the manner in which they report.
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:26:51 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 3, line 43, strike "choose to". The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Representative Priola presented prepared Amendment 5 concerning language in the "Arguments For" section regarding educational reforms passed by the state legislature (Attachment H). The committee discussed whether it was appropriate to discuss recent legislation, and whether the analysis should note that the state legislature passed recent reforms. After committee discussion, Representative Priola withdrew his original motion and moved to include substitute language concerning existing educational reforms.

130904 AttachH.pdf130904 AttachH.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:35:34 AM
MOVED:Priola
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 5 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment H). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:


BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:40:10 AM
MOVED:Priola
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 5, line 2, strike "help implement recent", and page 5, line 3, strike "educational reforms passed by the state legislature." and substitute "fund reforms already in law.". The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Senator Grantham presented prepared Amendment 6 concerning language in the "Arguments Against" section about district school boards in the summary and analysis section of the (Attachment I). The committee discussed whether to include language stating that district school boards must still approve the use of funds.

130904 AttachI.pdf130904 AttachI.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:43:25 AM
MOVED:Grantham
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 6 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment I). The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Representative DelGrosso presented prepared Amendment 7 concerning language about existing funding for public education in the "Arguments Against" section (Attachment J). The committee discussed whether money set aside by the legislature for public education should be considered "unspent" or "allocated for future use." After discussion, representative DelGrosso withdrew his original motion and offered substitute language concerning existing funding.

130904 AttachJ.pdf130904 AttachJ.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:46:27 AM
MOVED:DelGrosso
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 7 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment J). The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:


BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 10:51:03 AM
MOVED:DelGrosso
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 6, line 13, strike "education." and substitute "education that remains unspent.". The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Representative Murray presented prepared Amendment 8 regarding adding language to the "Arguments Against" section that concerns teacher effectiveness and class size. (Attachment K). Todd Herreid, Legislative Council Staff, came to the table and responded to questions from the committee concerning whether Senate Bill 13-213 already contains provisions addressing teacher effectiveness. After discussion, Representative Murray withdrew her original motion and Representative Priola offered substitute language concerning decreasing class size.

130904 AttachK.pdf130904 AttachK.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:00:22 AM
MOVED:Murray
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 6, line 23, after "assessments." add "Additionally, there is nothing in Senate Bill 13-213 that helps teachers be more effective or decreases class size.". The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Szabo
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:

BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:08:23 AM
MOVED:Priola
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 6, line 23, after "assessments." add "Additionally, there is nothing in Senate Bill 13-213 that decreases class size.". The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Representative Szabo presented prepared Amendment 9 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft that would add language to the "Arguments Against" section concerning discrepancies in county tax expenditures and receipts (Attachment L). Mr. Carey and Mr. Herreid responded to questions about whether there is data available concerning county tax expenditures and receipts compared to school district tax expenditures and receipts. They noted that there are some data limitations considering there are 178 school districts and only 64 counties in the state. They noted that accurate revenue numbers could be problematic since many school districts exist in multiple counties. Senator Scheffel discussed with the committee and Legislative Council Staff the possibility of adding a chart showing county tax expenditures and a chart showing school district tax receipts to the "Estimate of Fiscal Impact" section.

130904 AttachL.pdf130904 AttachL.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:10:25 AM
MOVED:Szabo
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 9 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment L). The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:39:39 AM
MOVED:Scheffel
MOTION:Move to instruct Legislative Council Staff to add two tables to the Initiative 22 Final Draft, one that includes a listing of projected tax receipts for each school district and one that includes a listing of projected tax collection in each county. The motion failed on a vote of 8-10.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
No
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 10 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Senator Renfroe presented prepared Amendment 4 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft concerning adding language to the summary and analysis section regarding "at-risk students" (Attachment M).

130904 AttachM.pdf130904 AttachM.pdf
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:43:21 AM
MOVED:Renfroe
MOTION:Adopt prepared Amendment 4 to the Initiative 22 Final Draft (Attachment M). The motion failed on a vote of 8-9 with one member excused.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
No
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
Excused
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
No
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
No
Morse
No
YES: 8 NO: 9 EXC: 1 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL



Senators Newell and Cadman discussed amending language in the summary and analysis section regarding the phrase "to pay for public education." The committee discussed whether the phrase "to help pay for public education" would be accurate and appropriate. The committee also discussed whether the phrase "increase public education funding" is more accurate than "pay for public education."
BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:45:40 AM
MOVED:Newell
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 1, line 10, after "to" add "help", and line 17, after "to" add "help". The motion failed on a vote of 10-8.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
No
Carroll
Yes
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
No
Grantham
No
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
Yes
Melton
Yes
Murray
No
Newell
Yes
Nicholson
Yes
Pabon
Yes
Priola
No
Renfroe
No
Scheffel
No
Szabo
No
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
Yes
YES: 10 NO: 8 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:Initiative 22
TIME: 11:53:55 AM
MOVED:Cadman
MOTION:Amend Initiative 22 Final Draft, page 1, line 10, strike "pay for public education;" and substitute "increase public education funding;". The motion passed on a vote of 12-6.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Yes
Carroll
No
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
Yes
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
No
Melton
No
Murray
Yes
Newell
No
Nicholson
No
Pabon
Yes
Priola
Yes
Renfroe
Yes
Scheffel
Yes
Szabo
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
No
YES: 12 NO: 6 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS




11:58 AM -- Blue Book Layout

Representative Court discussed adjusting the layout of the Blue Book. The current Blue Book layout lists the analysis of each measure followed by the texts and titles of each measure. The committee discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the current format; a format that lists each measure separately, starting with the text and title followed by the analysis; and a format that lists each measure separately, starting with the analysis followed by the text and title.
BILL:Blue Book Layout
TIME: 12:03:26 PM
MOVED:Court
MOTION:Move to adjust the layout of the Blue Book so that each measure is listed separately, starting with the text and title followed by the analysis. The motion was withdrawn.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
Carroll
Court
DelGrosso
Grantham
Guzman
Hullinghorst
Melton
Murray
Newell
Nicholson
Pabon
Priola
Renfroe
Scheffel
Waller
Ferrandino
Morse
YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION:


BILL:Blue Book Layout
TIME: 12:04:37 PM
MOVED:Court
MOTION:Move to adjust the layout of the Blue Book so that each measure is listed separately, starting with the analysis followed by the text and title. The motion passed on a vote of 13-5.
SECONDED:
VOTE
Cadman
No
Carroll
Yes
Court
Yes
DelGrosso
Yes
Grantham
No
Guzman
Yes
Hullinghorst
Yes
Melton
Yes
Murray
Yes
Newell
Yes
Nicholson
Yes
Pabon
No
Priola
No
Renfroe
No
Scheffel
Yes
Waller
Yes
Ferrandino
Yes
Morse
Yes
YES: 13 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

12:06 PM

The committee adjourned.