House Committee on Judiciary (04/29/2010)

Final
STAFF SUMMARY OF MEETING

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

Date:	04/29/2010	ATTENDANCE

Time:	02:37 PM to 08:59 PM	Court	X
		Gardner B.	X
Place:	HCR 0107	Kagan	X
		King S.	*
This Meeting was called to order by		Miklosi	X
	Representative Levy	Nikkel	*
		Pace	X
This Report was prepared by		Ryden	X
	Jessika Shipley	Waller	X
		McCann	X
		Levy	X
		X = Present, E = Excused, A = Absent, * = Present after roll call

Bills Addressed:		Action Taken:
HB10-1152 SB10-076 HB10-1421 HB10-1422		Amended, Referred to Appropriations Amended, Referred to the Committee of the Whole Amended, Referred to the Committee of the Whole Amended, Referred to the Committee of the Whole

02:41 PM -- House Bill 10-1152

Representative Frangas, prime sponsor, returned to the committee to discuss House Bill 10-1152 concerning the civil rights of persons with disabilities. The bill was originally referred by the Judiciary Committee to the Committee on Appropriations on Thursday, February 18, 2010. The bill was then referred back to the Judiciary Committee by the House Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended by the House Judiciary Committee, makes several changes to state law concerning civil rights law and discrimination against persons with disabilities. Specifically, the bill does the following:

• allows the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and the courts to impose a fine on persons and organizations found guilty of violating the civil rights of a person with disabilities of up to $10,000 for a first offense, and up to $25,000 for a repeat offense;
• prohibits state agencies and public entities from discriminating against persons with disabilities who are eligible to receive a government service or to participate in a public program, and specifies the type of relief and damages allowed in the event of such discrimination;
• standardizes and increases misdemeanor penalties for several existing civil rights violations, and creates new misdemeanor offenses for violating specific rights of persons with disabilities;
• identifies damages and allows for payment of attorney costs in various civil rights cases involving persons with disabilities;
• clarifies and updates the rights of persons with and trainers of assistance animals; and
• allows a person who is retaliated against for filing a complaint with the state Medicaid program to receive damages.

02:46 PM -- Kevin Williams, Colorado Cross-disability Coalition (CCDC), spoke in support of the bill. He explained each of the prepared amendments to the bill (Attachments A-L). Mr. Willams responded to extensive questioning from the committee.

03:47 PM -- Joan Zivic, Automobile Association of America (AAA) Colorado, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Zivic stated her opinion that the focus of the bill should be on increasing accessibility for people with disabilities rather than increasing penalties and damages for violations. She expressed concern that the bill will create a burden on business owners. Ms. Zivic responded to questions from the committee.

03:56 PM -- Tony Gagliardi, National Federation of Independent Business, spoke in support of the bill. Mr. Gagliardi discussed litigation that has occurred as a result of similar legislation in California. He expressed his opinion that the bill is bad for small businesses. He asked the committee to lower the fine to $1,000 per violation or to simply kill the bill. Mr. Gagliardi responded to questions from the committee.

04:13 PM -- Julie Reiskin, CCDC, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. Reiskin stated her opinion that most disabled individuals simply want to get through the day and do not file lawsuits until they have exhausted all other options. She disagreed that the bill would lead to increased litigation. Ms. Reiskin responded to questions from the committee.

04:19 PM

Representative Levy announced that witness testimony would be closed. She explained that the House Judiciary Committee report dated February 18, 2010 (HB1152_C.001), was redrafted as prepared amendment L.036 (Attachment M), which strikes everything below the enacting clause. All amendments were made to L.036.


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	05:30:26 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.036 (Attachment M), which strikes everything below the enacting clause. Members of the committee discussed their positions on the bill with Representative Frangas. The motion passed on a vote of 7-4.
SECONDED:	Levy
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	No
	Kagan	Yes
	King S.	No
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	No
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	No
	McCann	Yes
	Levy	Yes
Not Final YES: 7 NO: 4 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	05:16:10 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.035 (Attachment Q), which amends L.036. The committee discussed the amendment. The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Nikkel
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	05:06:00 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.032 (Attachment P), which amends L.036. Mr. Williams explained how the amendment would apply. The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Waller
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	05:04:56 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.030 (Attachment O), which amends L.036. The committee discussed the amendment extensively. The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Nikkel
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:47:25 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.029 (Attachment K), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:46:51 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.028 (Attachment J), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:32:18 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.027 (Attachment I), which amends L.036. The motion passed on a vote of 7-4.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	No
	Kagan	Yes
	King S.	No
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	No
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	No
	McCann	Yes
	Levy	Yes
Not Final YES: 7 NO: 4 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:41:46 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Adopt prepared amendment L.034 (Attachment N), which is a substitute amendment for L.027. Both L.034 and L.027 amend L.036. The members discussed the substitute amendment with Mr. Williams. The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Waller
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:31:40 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.026 (Attachment H), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:30:50 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.033 (Attachment G), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:29:59 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.024 (Attachment F), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:29:08 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.023 (Attachment E), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:28:22 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.022 (Attachment L), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:27:17 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.021 (Attachment D), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:25:18 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.020 (Attachment C), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:24:54 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.018 (Attachment B), which amends L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:23:07 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.017 (Attachment A), which amends prepared amendment L.036. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	04:24:06 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Lay over House Bill 10-1152 until May 13, 2010. The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Waller
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	HB10-1152
TIME:	05:31:46 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 10-1152, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations with a favorable recommendation. The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Ryden
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	No
	Kagan	No
	King S.	No
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	No
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	No
	McCann	Yes
	Levy	Yes
Final YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

05:34 PM -- Senate Bill 10-076

Representative Levy announced a brief recess.

05:43 PM

Representative Levy called the committee back to order.

Representative Primavera, sponsor, presented Senate Bill 10-076 concerning unreasonable insurance claims settlement practices. The reengrossed bill prohibits an insurance company from providing a financial incentive to a person for the purpose of influencing that person's decision to deny or delay a claim, or to cancel or rescind an insurance policy. In civil actions on claim denials, the court may instruct the jury that such financial incentives are prohibited.

05:48 PM -- Paula Van Dusen, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. Van Dusen related details of her personal experience with the cancellation of an insurance policy.

05:50 PM -- Vicki Rottman, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. Rottman related details of her personal experience with insurance claims practices she believes were unreasonable. She distributed her written testimony to the committee (Attachment R).

05:55 PM -- Colleen McMahon, representing herself, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. McMahon discussed her experience with a catastrophic automobile accident. She spoke at length about her dissatisfaction with the way she was treated by her insurance company.

06:08 PM -- Kelly Campbell, Property and Casualty Insurance Association, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Campbell denied that the practice addressed by the bill currently takes place within the insurance industry. She stated that current law adequately addresses any unreasonable practices. She expressed concern about the broadness of the scope of the bill, which could lead to unintentional consequences. Ms. Campbell discussed the process of claims settlement.

06:13 PM -- Robert Ferm, representing the American Insurance Association and Met Life, spoke in opposition to the bill. Mr. Ferm discussed prepared amendment L.007 (Attachment S) and the appropriateness of outsourcing.

06:18 PM -- Debby Magures, Pinnacol Assurance, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Magures denied that the practice addressed by the bill takes place at Pinnacol. She discussed an incentive program in place at Pinnacol that is not tied to the denial or delay of claims.

06:25 PM -- Robert Rosenthal, Colorado Land Title Association, spoke in opposition to the bill.

06:27 PM -- Amy Crain-Chadwick, Allied Nationwide Insurance Company, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Crain-Chadwick is a casualty claims specialist. She discussed her role as a claims investigator. She stressed that her goal is always to find coverage for a client to make him or her whole. Ms. Crain-Chadwick responded to questions from the committee.

06:36 PM -- Ben Price and Marc Reece, representing the Colorado Association of Health Plans, spoke in opposition to the bill. Mr. Reece discussed prepared amendment L.005 (Attachment T), which addresses jury instructions and discovery.

06:41 PM -- Nanci Valdez, Farmers Insurance, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Valdez denied that the practice addressed by the bill takes place at Farmers. She discussed the evaluation process for claims adjusters at Farmers. Ms. Valdez responded to questions from the committee.

06:45 PM -- Tara Reilly, State Farm, spoke in opposition to the bill. Ms. Reilly spoke about the cost of fraud. She stated that State Farm does not oppose amendment L.005. She responded to questions from the committee.

06:55 PM -- Craig Sellers, Pie Forensic Consultants, testified that he did not know of any instances in which insurance company personnel were compensated for denying claims. He stated that the bill might lead to claims being paid without merit. He responded to questions from Representative Levy regarding obligations to thoroughly investigate claims.

07:00 PM -- Dr. Rochelle Cohen, Health Care for All Colorado, spoke in support of the bill. Dr. Cohen is a provider and consumer of health care insurance. She advocates comprehensive health care reform for the benefit of all Coloradans. She discussed her experience arguing with insurance providers on behalf of her patients and stated her opinion that such time spent is not productive or useful for the provider, the physician, or the patient. Dr. Cohen responded to questions from the committee about the role of a physician in the claims settlement process.

07:06 PM -- Dana Dzwonkowski, American Cancer Society, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. Dzwonkowski discussed specific instances of the unreasonable practices addressed by the bill.

07:10 PM -- Charlie Hebeler, Colorado Dental Association, spoke in support of the bill with amendment L.007. Ms. Hebeler talked about the need for the amendment, which requires that any determination that a covered benefit is not medically necessary, appropriate, effective, or efficient be made by an appropriate health care provider licensed in the United States. The committee discussed the amendment.

07:19 PM -- Melissa Collins, Colorado Chiropractic Association, spoke in support of the bill. Ms. Collins stressed that nothing in the bill prohibits the denial of claims for proper reasons. She discussed the fact that the practice addressed by the bill is not covered under current bad faith law. She expressed her opinion that the bill will not result in burdensome litigation. Ms. Collins testified that 16 other states have enacted this type of legislation. She responded to questions from the committee.


BILL:	SB10-076
TIME:	07:26:06 PM
MOVED:	Miklosi
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.005 (Attachment T). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Court
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	SB10-076
TIME:	07:26:53 PM
MOVED:	Miklosi
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.007 (Attachment S). The motion failed on a vote of 4-7.
SECONDED:	Kagan
		VOTE
	Court	No
	Gardner B.	No
	Kagan	Yes
	King S.	No
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	No
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	No
	McCann	No
	Levy	No
Not Final YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL


BILL:	SB10-076
TIME:	07:28:43 PM
MOVED:	Court
MOTION:	Refer Senate Bill 10-76, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. Members of the committee commented about the bill. The motion passed on a vote of 7-4.
SECONDED:	Kagan
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	No
	Kagan	Yes
	King S.	No
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	No
	McCann	No
	Levy	Yes
Final YES: 7 NO: 4 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

07:31 PM -- House Bill 10-1421

Representatives Weissmann and May, co-sponsors, presented House Bill 10-1421 concerning the decommission of a correctional facility operated by the Department of Corrections (DOC). The bill requires the DOC to close by November 1, 2010, one state-run correctional facility that has a bed capacity of at least 500. The DOC is to direct 20 percent of the savings realized in FY 2010-11 to the private prison per diem rate for programs that reduce recidivism. The bill does not specify which prison should be closed.

The committee discussed the reasons for accomplishing the goals of the bill through legislation rather than through the normal budget process. They talked about the impact to local communities when a prison is closed. The issue of recidivism rates at private prisons versus those at state facilities was discussed. Prepared amendment L.005 was distributed to the committee (Attachment U). Discussion about how best to use the savings generated by the bill ensued.

07:54 PM -- Karl Spiecker, DOC, testified about the bill. Mr. Spiecker stated his opinion that the bill is in response to a very unique economic climate. The inmate population is currently declining. The DOC staff is the most important asset of the department, according to Mr. Spiecker. He discussed the public safety mission of the DOC and the critical needs of the department. He stated that the DOC does not object to the provisions of the bill because it recognizes that the state is in such a unique position. He expressed his opinion that the department will be able to reorganize and reassign staff in the event that a prison closes. He does not believe that staff will be laid off as a result. Mr. Spiecker responded to questions from the committee about how the decision about which prison to close would be made. The committee continued to discuss the effect of the bill on the DOC.

08:16 PM

Discussion continued about which facility will close if the bill is enacted and the effects of the closure on the DOC and the community.

08:29 PM -- Bailey Phelps and Scott Wasserman, Colorado Workers for Innovation and New Solutions (WINS), spoke in opposition to the bill. Mr. Phelps discussed the unique challenges of classifying inmates. He expressed his opinion that spending more money on private prisons is not the right thing to do. He spoke about the effects of the bill on the employees of the facility that is chosen to be decommissioned. Mr. Wasserman stated that his objection to the bill comes down to the effectiveness of private versus public prisons. The position of Colorado WINS is that the ideal correctional system is publicly operated. Mr. Wasserman responded to questions from the committee.


BILL:	HB10-1421
TIME:	08:50:07 PM
MOVED:	Levy
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.005 (Attachment U). The amendment adjusts the allocation of savings as a result of the bill. The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Pace
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1421
TIME:	08:51:26 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 10-1421, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. The motion passed on a vote of 6-5.
SECONDED:	Nikkel
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	No
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	No
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	No
	Ryden	No
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	No
	Levy	Yes
Final YES: 6 NO: 5 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

08:53 PM -- House Bill 10-1422

Representative B. Gardner, prime sponsor, presented House Bill 10-1422 concerning the revision of statutes in the Colorado Revised Statutes and amending or repealing obsolete, inconsistent, and conflicting provisions of law and clarifying the language to reflect the legislative intent of the laws. Often referred to as the Revisor's Bill, this bill is recommended by the Committee on Legal Services to amend or repeal obsolete, inconsistent, or conflicting laws. In some instances, it also clarifies statutory language to more accurately reflect legislative intent. The specific reasons for each amendment or repeal are set forth in the bill's appendix.

Representative Gardner distributed prepared amendment L.001 (Attachment V).


BILL:	HB10-1422
TIME:	08:57:40 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Adopt prepared amendment L.001 (Attachment V). The motion passed without objection.
SECONDED:	Nikkel
		VOTE
	Court
	Gardner B.
	Kagan
	King S.
	Miklosi
	Nikkel
	Pace
	Ryden
	Waller
	McCann
	Levy
Not Final YES: 0 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: Pass Without Objection


BILL:	HB10-1422
TIME:	08:57:53 PM
MOVED:	Gardner B.
MOTION:	Refer House Bill 10-1422, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. The motion passed on a vote of 11-0.
SECONDED:	Nikkel
		VOTE
	Court	Yes
	Gardner B.	Yes
	Kagan	Yes
	King S.	Yes
	Miklosi	Yes
	Nikkel	Yes
	Pace	Yes
	Ryden	Yes
	Waller	Yes
	McCann	Yes
	Levy	Yes
Final YES: 11 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS

08:58 PM

Representative Levy adjourned the committee.